Neither MLflow nor Continual offers a free trial.
Pricing details for both MLflow and Continual are unavailable at this time. Contact the respective providers for more information.
MLflow offers several advantages, including Open source platform, Experiment tracking feature, Powerful visualization capabilities, Model evaluation, Model registry and many more functionalities.
The cons of MLflow may include a Lack of customer support, Complex Configuration, No GUI, No real-time collaboration. and Dependent on Python environment
Continual offers several advantages, including Cloud-based predictive modeling, Uses SQL for app creation, Works with BigQuery, Snowflake, Redshift and many more functionalities.
The cons of Continual may include a SQL-centric, Limited to cloud data platforms, Dependency on modern data stacks, No MLOPS infrastructure. and Dependent on continuous access to data warehouse
