Imaginary Programming vs Sourcegraph Cody

Imaginary Programming or Sourcegraph Cody? A Comprehensive Review

	Imaginary Programming Code generation using TypeScript and GPT runtime. Visit Website Visit Website	Sourcegraph Cody Code assistant aiding coding queries & suggestions. Visit Website Visit Website

Overview

Description	Introducing Imaginary Programming – a powerful SaaS tool that uses TypeScript and GPT runtime to automatically generate code. This innovative product leverages OpenAI's GPT engine to Read more +	Meet Sourcegraph Cody, the ultimate code assistant for developers. This AI-powered tool leverages Sourcegraph's code graph and Large Language Models (LLMs) to provide seamless coding Read more +
Pricing Options	No free trial Not Available	No free trial Not Available
	Visit Website	Visit Website

Features

Total Features	Features	Features
Unique Features	No features	No features
	Visit Website	Visit Website

Pricing

Pricing Option
Starting From	Not Available	Not Available
	View Detailed Pricing	View Detailed Pricing

Other Details

Customer Types	No customer type information available	No customer type information available
	Visit Website	Visit Website

User Reviews

User Ratings	No Reviews	No Reviews
Pros	TypeScript-based No need for ML team Generates structured data JSON data output Inclusion of Playground feature Frontend developers can add intelligence Solves new problems Can define function prototype Can classify data with human-like intelligence Extracts structured data from unstructured language	Chatbot knows your code Interactive code writing and refactoring Generates unit tests and documentation Assistive code suggestions App for code local on device VS Code and JetBrains extensions Integrated with Sourcegraph enterprise instance Chat interface in editor or sidebar Feedback for response improvement Generates code answering queries
Cons	TypeScript only Dependent on GPT availability No offline usage No predefined templates Reliant on good comments Lacks support for non-text tasks Limited to specific JS frameworks Not for backend development Requires manual output structure definition No mention of scalability	Requires feedback for accuracy Limited editor extensions JetBrains extension is experimental Limited to Sourcegraph enterprise Requires full codebase access Dependency on open-source data Limited to pre-defined recipes Depends on existing coding conventions Context dependent fixup instructions Relies on Sourcegraph's code graph

Media and Screenshots

Screenshots

Popular categories

Quick compares

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

Stuck on something? We're here to help with all the questions and answers in one place.

Neither Imaginary Programming nor Sourcegraph Cody offers a free trial.

Pricing details for both Imaginary Programming and Sourcegraph Cody are unavailable at this time. Contact the respective providers for more information.

Imaginary Programming offers several advantages, including TypeScript-based, No need for ML team, Generates structured data, JSON data output, Inclusion of Playground feature and many more functionalities.

The cons of Imaginary Programming may include a TypeScript only, Dependent on GPT availability, No offline usage, No predefined templates. and No mention of scalability

Sourcegraph Cody offers several advantages, including Chatbot knows your code, Interactive code writing and refactoring, Generates unit tests and documentation, Assistive code suggestions, App for code local on device and many more functionalities.

The cons of Sourcegraph Cody may include a Requires feedback for accuracy, Limited editor extensions, JetBrains extension is experimental, Limited to Sourcegraph enterprise. and Relies on Sourcegraph's code graph

Disclaimer: This research has been collated from a variety of authoritative sources. We welcome your feedback at [email protected].

Imaginary Programming vs Sourcegraph Cody

Imaginary Programming or Sourcegraph Cody? A Comprehensive Review