Imaginary Programming or CodeAssist Tech? A Comprehensive Review

TypeScript-based

No need for ML team

Generates structured data

JSON data output

Inclusion of Playground feature

Frontend developers can add intelligence

Solves new problems

Can define function prototype

Can classify data with human-like intelligence

Extracts structured data from unstructured language

Natural language chatbot interface

Changes code in editor

Generates code completion

Considers entire codebase

Supports all popular languages

More concise than ChatGPT

Allows user interaction

Doesn't hide IDE completions

Improved results than Copilot

Code not stored on server

TypeScript only

Dependent on GPT availability

No offline usage

No predefined templates

Reliant on good comments

Lacks support for non-text tasks

Limited to specific JS frameworks

Not for backend development

Requires manual output structure definition

No mention of scalability

Might not always provide correct answers

Misinterprets user intention at times

Can be slow during high usage

Code is processed and stored externally

Setup and installation required

Limited to Jetbrains IDEs and Visual Studio

Relatively slower code generation

Possible privacy concerns